Skip to content

Adding cirq util tests on a suite random circuits + some refactors. #328

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 18 commits into from
Jun 23, 2025

Conversation

weinbe58
Copy link
Member

@weinbe58 weinbe58 commented Jun 20, 2025

Splitting up the massive function into several smaller functions that can be called to process the data.

@weinbe58 weinbe58 requested a review from jon-wurtz June 20, 2025 18:57
Copy link

codecov bot commented Jun 20, 2025

Codecov Report

Attention: Patch coverage is 96.55172% with 4 lines in your changes missing coverage. Please review.

Files with missing lines Patch % Lines
src/bloqade/cirq_utils/parallelize.py 96.49% 4 Missing ⚠️

📢 Thoughts on this report? Let us know!

Copy link
Contributor

github-actions bot commented Jun 20, 2025

☂️ Python Coverage

current status: ✅

Overall Coverage

Lines Covered Coverage Threshold Status
8860 7818 88% 0% 🟢

New Files

No new covered files...

Modified Files

File Coverage Status
src/bloqade/cirq_utils/init.py 100% 🟢
src/bloqade/cirq_utils/lineprog.py 77% 🟢
src/bloqade/cirq_utils/parallelize.py 95% 🟢
TOTAL 90% 🟢

updated for commit: ad6f1f7 by action🐍

@weinbe58 weinbe58 changed the title Adding cirq util tests on a suite random circuits + some small refactors. Adding cirq util tests on a suite random circuits + some refactors. Jun 20, 2025
@jon-wurtz
Copy link
Contributor

LGTM 👍

Copy link
Contributor

@jon-wurtz jon-wurtz left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

👍

@weinbe58 weinbe58 merged commit a70a49e into main Jun 23, 2025
11 checks passed
@weinbe58 weinbe58 deleted the phil/cirq-util-tests branch June 23, 2025 20:06
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants